Chinese Taipei
League: Asia Cup U16 Women Division A
Record
3W - 2L
Avg Score
76.2 - 80.6
Points per 100 Possessions
Offensive Rating
89.1
Defensive Rating
96.6
Net Rating
-7.5
| # | Player | Age | Height | Position | Nationality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 |
|
17 | 165 cm (5'5") | F | Chinese Taipei |
| 6 |
|
16 | - | N/A | Chinese Taipei |
| 1 |
|
17 | - | N/A | Chinese Taipei |
| 7 |
|
16 | - | N/A | Chinese Taipei |
| 13 |
|
16 | - | N/A | Chinese Taipei |
| 9 |
|
16 | - | N/A | Chinese Taipei |
| 12 |
|
16 | - | N/A | Chinese Taipei |
| 8 |
|
15 | - | N/A | Chinese Taipei |
| 4 |
|
16 | - | N/A | Chinese Taipei |
| 11 |
|
16 | - | N/A | Chinese Taipei |
| 24 |
|
15 | - | N/A | Chinese Taipei |
| 10 |
|
17 | - | N/A | Chinese Taipei |
Player Statistics
| Player | GP | GS | MIN | PTS | FGM | FGA | FG% | 2PM | 2PA | 2P% | 3PM | 3PA | 3P% | FTM | FTA | FT% | OR | DR | REB | AST | STL | TOV | BLK | PF | PFD | EFF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
5 | 5 | 140:52 | 75 | 24 | 66 | 36.4% | 16 | 36 | 44.4% | 8 | 30 | 26.7% | 19 | 20 | 95.0% | 6 | 13 | 19 | 19 | 13 | 10 | 0 | 11 | 0 | 14.6 |
|
|
5 | 5 | 133:02 | 52 | 18 | 37 | 48.6% | 16 | 21 | 76.2% | 2 | 16 | 12.5% | 14 | 20 | 70.0% | 3 | 11 | 14 | 29 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 14.0 |
|
|
5 | 5 | 51:46 | 4 | 2 | 19 | 10.5% | 2 | 14 | 14.3% | 0 | 5 | 0.0% | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 9 | 0 | -1.2 |
|
|
5 | 0 | 38:45 | 6 | 2 | 15 | 13.3% | 2 | 8 | 25.0% | 0 | 7 | 0.0% | 2 | 2 | 100.0% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1.2 |
|
|
5 | 0 | 27:27 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 25.0% | 1 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0.0 |
|
|
5 | 0 | 107:40 | 38 | 14 | 35 | 40.0% | 7 | 22 | 31.8% | 7 | 13 | 53.8% | 3 | 4 | 75.0% | 9 | 19 | 28 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 2 | 13 | 0 | 9.4 |
|
|
5 | 0 | 36:06 | 10 | 4 | 15 | 26.7% | 4 | 11 | 36.4% | 0 | 4 | 0.0% | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0.6 |
|
|
5 | 5 | 138:36 | 79 | 31 | 73 | 42.5% | 28 | 53 | 52.8% | 3 | 20 | 15.0% | 14 | 17 | 82.4% | 6 | 27 | 33 | 15 | 8 | 11 | 4 | 10 | 0 | 16.6 |
|
|
5 | 0 | 68:52 | 37 | 13 | 31 | 41.9% | 5 | 12 | 41.7% | 8 | 19 | 42.1% | 3 | 3 | 100.0% | 1 | 7 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 6.0 |
|
|
5 | 0 | 77:40 | 26 | 10 | 28 | 35.7% | 9 | 20 | 45.0% | 1 | 8 | 12.5% | 5 | 8 | 62.5% | 10 | 8 | 18 | 7 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 6.0 |
|
|
5 | 0 | 103:11 | 33 | 15 | 40 | 37.5% | 13 | 29 | 44.8% | 2 | 11 | 18.2% | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 10 | 3 | 13 | 10 | 5 | 7 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 5.6 |
|
|
5 | 5 | 75:58 | 19 | 6 | 31 | 19.4% | 6 | 23 | 26.1% | 0 | 8 | 0.0% | 7 | 9 | 77.8% | 12 | 13 | 25 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 16 | 0 | 5.2 |
| Player | GP | GS | MIN | POSS | USG% | +/- | NETRTG | ORTG | DRTG | TS% | EFG% | AST RATIO | AST% | FT RATE | PACE40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
5 | 5 | 140:52 | 126 | 4.8 | +14.0 | 47.5 | 154.2 | 106.7 | 56.6% | 46.9% | 0.2 | 22.8% | 47.181 | 35.7 |
|
|
5 | 5 | 133:02 | 138 | 3.3 | +19.0 | -1.1 | 105.8 | 106.9 | 46.7% | 38.1% | 0.3 | 28.5% | 36.242 | 41.5 |
|
|
5 | 5 | 51:46 | 49 | 4.2 | -49.0 | -93.7 | 13.6 | 107.3 | 10.0% | 10.0% | 0.0 | 1.8% | 0.000 | 38.1 |
|
|
5 | 0 | 38:45 | 40 | 2.4 | -40.0 | -88.1 | 19.7 | 107.9 | 9.0% | 7.2% | 0.0 | 2.2% | 4.444 | 41.7 |
|
|
5 | 0 | 27:27 | 26 | 2.0 | -30.0 | -40.7 | 68.4 | 109.1 | 20.0% | 20.0% | 0.0 | 0.0% | 0.000 | 38.3 |
|
|
5 | 0 | 107:40 | 89 | 3.1 | +4.0 | 22.8 | 129.4 | 106.6 | 51.8% | 49.6% | 0.0 | 2.8% | 9.818 | 33.2 |
|
|
5 | 0 | 36:06 | 42 | 5.0 | -29.0 | -72.6 | 35.4 | 108.0 | 27.5% | 14.2% | 0.1 | 2.2% | 6.667 | 46.1 |
|
|
5 | 5 | 138:36 | 151 | 5.1 | +17.0 | 34.4 | 140.6 | 106.2 | 51.7% | 46.5% | 0.1 | 14.6% | 18.207 | 43.7 |
|
|
5 | 0 | 68:52 | 89 | 3.7 | 0 | -57.0 | 52.5 | 109.6 | 46.4% | 44.3% | 0.0 | 3.5% | 5.455 | 51.9 |
|
|
5 | 0 | 77:40 | 58 | 3.4 | -12.0 | -6.1 | 101.6 | 107.7 | 42.3% | 32.0% | 0.1 | 6.8% | 28.722 | 29.8 |
|
|
5 | 0 | 103:11 | 94 | 3.6 | -4.0 | -16.7 | 91.9 | 108.6 | 36.6% | 36.2% | 0.1 | 8.9% | 1.538 | 36.5 |
|
|
5 | 5 | 75:58 | 55 | 3.7 | 0 | -44.9 | 61.6 | 106.5 | 23.3% | 13.3% | 0.1 | 6.0% | 26.667 | 28.9 |
Stats based on team's performance on basketball games.
Glossary and
stats explanations.
Chinese Taipei Shot Chart
Note: Shot chart colors show how a team or player performs relative to league averages in each court sector, using sector-specific league rankings rather than fixed shooting percentages.
Elite
Average
Cold
No Data
Sector Breakdown
Note: Values are average per game
Attempts Share
Points Distribution
Scoring Breakdown
Note: Percentages calculated using average per game values. Hover over each section to see
values.
Chinese Taipei Stats
PTS
76.2
3rd
ORTG
89.1
5th
eFG%
38.7
5th
AST
19.4
2nd
OREB
16.4
4th
OREB%
30.9
6th
DREB
25.2
7th
DREB%
57.1
7th
TOV
15.6
4th
TOV%
18.6
3rd
Opponent Stats
PTS
80.6
3rd
ORTG
96.6
4th
eFG%
46.0
4th
AST
17.6
3rd
OREB
17.2
3rd
OREB%
42.9
3rd
DREB
35.2
1st
DREB%
69.1
3rd
TOV
23.2
2nd
TOV%
27.3
3rd
Note: Color-scale:
worst,
bad,
average,
good,
perfect.
The color-scale used for the opponents is reversed (the best the opponents perform, the worst is for
the team).
Team Efficiency
Points scored - points allowed per 100 possessions.
Full Season
89.1 - 96.6
-7.5
Record: 3W - 2L
A - GROUP PHASE - SINGLE
79.9 - 102.9
-23.0
Record: 2W - 1L
14 - QUALIFICATION TO SEMI-FINALS - SINGLE
88.6 - 92.5
-3.9
Record: 0W - 1L
16 - CLASS. 5-6 - SINGLE
117.0 - 81.8
35.2
Record: 1W - 0L
Home Games
100.4 - 88.5
11.9
Record: 2W - 1L
Road Games
72.0 - 108.7
-36.7
Record: 1W - 1L
Note: Team efficiency is one of the most important metrics in basketball. It shows how many points a
team scores/allows per possession (here per 100 possessions). This can be a better indicator than
the average scoring per game, as it is not affected by the pace of the game or by extra minutes
played (overtime).