NP

Naomi Natalie Panganiban

PG · Philippines · · 19 yrs · 170 cm
ACWA 2025
Season Averages
Season GP MIN PTS FG% 2P% 3P% FT% REB AST TOV STL BLK
ACWA 2025 5 26:29 13.2 37.1% 45.5% 27.6% 85.7% 3.2 2.4 1.4 1.2 0.0
Scoring Efficiency
PTS
13.2
TS%
48.5%
EFG%
43.5%
FT%
85.7%
2P%
45.5%
3P%
27.6%
Ball Handling
AST
2.4
TOV
1.4
pAST
5.6
AST%
18.6%
TOV%
6.3%
Hustling
REB
3.2
OR
1.0
DR
2.2
STL
1.2
BLK
0.0
Teamwork
PTS+
67.2
PTS-
90.4
+/-
-116
Participation & Usage
MINS
26:29
GAMES
5
USG%
5.0%
Scoring
PPG
91%
More than
91%
of players
PPG: 13.2
Points per game scored.

PTS: 13.2
EFG%
45%
More than
45%
of players
EFG%: 46.5%
Effective field goal measures the player's shooting ability accounting for the value of 3-point shots.

Points per Shot: 1.06.
2PM 3.0, 3PM 1.6, FGA 12.4.
TS%
45%
More than
45%
of players
TS%: 51.2%
True shooting percentage measures scoring efficiency.

Points per scoring attempt: 0.97.
PTS 13.2, FGA 12.4, FTA 2.8.
Ball Handling
AST%
83%
More than
83%
of players
AST%: 18.6%
Share of teammate field goals assisted while on the floor.

Assists per game 2.4, points assisted 5.6.
TOV%
48%
More than
48%
of players
TOV%: 6.3%
Turnovers per offensive involvement (lower is better).

Turnovers 1.4, scoring attempts 13.6.
Rebounding
RPG
60%
More than
60%
of players
RPG: 3.2
Total rebounds secured per game compared to league peers.

Overall rebound share 31.6%.
ORB%
63%
More than
63%
of players
ORB%: 3.8%
Share of available offensive rebounds collected.

Offensive boards per game 1.0.
DRB%
64%
More than
64%
of players
DRB%: 9.2%
Share of available defensive rebounds collected.

Defensive boards per game 2.2.
Usage Rate
USG%
85%
More than
85%
of players
USG%: 5.0%
Share of team possessions finished by the player.

Possessions: 22.3 Estimated possessions played per game in this competition.
Actions taken: 12.4 FGA, 2.8 FTA, 2.4 AST, 1.4 TOV.
Shooting
80.0% 38.9% 50.0% 0.0% 66.7% 0.0% 50.0% 50.0% 28.6% 22.2% 25.0% 33.3%

Note: Shot chart colors show how the player performs relative to league averages in each court sector, using sector-specific league rankings rather than fixed shooting percentages.

Elite
Average
Cold
No Data
Sector breakdown
Restricted Area
80.0% 4/5 8.1%
Paint
38.9% 7/18 29.0%
Mid-Range
40.0% 4/10 16.1%
3-Point Range
27.6% 8/29 46.8%

Note: Values are averages per game for this season.